PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP DELIK TERTINGGAL DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA TERPISAH.

Authors

  • Muhammad Ismunanda Isman Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Jayabaya
  • Mardi Candra 3Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Jayabaya
  • Basuki Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Jayabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v3i6.2884

Keywords:

Left Behind Offenses, Separate Case Examination, Law Enforcement.

Abstract

It is not uncommon for the perpetrator of a crime to commit several crimes, meaning that the perpetrator of the crime commits a crime more than once, the crime itself must be tried by law, and it is the responsibility of law enforcement officials, usually to account for the actions of the perpetrator of the crime itself, the investigator conducts split case handling, meaning that crimes that have not been tried in the handling of the case are handled separately, this also results in different court decisions. In its application, it often contradicts Article 12 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Code which regulates the maximum imprisonment for a certain period of time and Article 71 of the Criminal Code which regulates the calculation of the offense left behind, so that in its application it contradicts the theory of legal objectives and law enforcement. As happened in the Robert Tantular case. The method in this research uses normative juridical, because the approach taken is based on the main legal material by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and laws and regulations and can also describe, situations, phenomena, or problems that refer to legal norms contained in various laws and regulations, court decisions. The author also uses case studies as a research strategy to investigate carefully about a program, event, activity, process, or group of individuals. The data used in this research includes primary data and secondary data. In practice in Indonesia, there are still mistakes in the application of law made by law enforcers, especially by the Panel of Judges, even though the provisions of underdeveloped offenses have also been regulated in the Criminal Code to limit the arbitrariness of law enforcement officials in enforcing the law related to underdeveloped offenses. Thus, in order to avoid mistakes in its application, technical guidance is needed related to the handling of underdeveloped criminal offenses by law enforcement officials so that law enforcement can run in accordance with the provisions of the legislation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Derita Prapti Rahayu. Budaya Hukum Rampai Kolom dan Artikel Pilihan Dalam Bidang Hukum, Jakarta; Prenada Media Grouf, 2008.

Romli Atmasasmita. Teori Hukum Integratif Rekonstruksi Teori Hukum Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Proregsif, Yogyakarta; Genta Publishing, 2012.

Moelyatno. Asas Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta; Rineka Cipta, 2008.

Adnan buyung Nastion, Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta; LP3ES, 1988.

Asadar Djabbar. Sinkronisasi Pemidanaan dan Penggunaan Hukum Adat. Dalam Problematika Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional, Jakarta; KHN-RI, 2013.

Mardjono Reksodiputro, "Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana", Jakarta: Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan Dan Pengabdian Hukum (d/h Lembaga Kriminologi), Universitas Indonesia, 1997.

Eddy OS. Hiariej. Beberapa Catatan RUU KUHAP dan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Dalam Konteks Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Dalam Problematika Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional, Jakarta; Komisi Hukum Nasional RI, 2013.

Dista Anggraeni, Novi Damayanti, “Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan di Indonesia”, Jurnal Universitas Sebelas Maret, Vol 1 Number 2, 2022.

Soerjono Soekanto. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakkan Hukum. Raja Grafindo. Jakarta. 1983.

Eva Achjani Zulfa, Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan, cet. 1 (Bandung: Lubuk Agung, 2011).

Moch. Anwar, Beberapa Ketentuan Umum dalam Buku Pertama KUHP, (Bandung: Alumni, 1986).

Aruan Sakidjo dan Bambang Poernomo, Hukum Pidana : Dasar Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Kodifikasi, (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, (Yogyakarta : Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016).

Leden Marpaung, Asas-Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika,. Jakarta, 2005.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1984.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-04

How to Cite

Isman, M. I., Candra, M., & Basuki, B. (2024). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP DELIK TERTINGGAL DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA TERPISAH. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(6), 2638–2648. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v3i6.2884