PENGARUH PENGALAMAN, RISIKO AUDIT, DAN KEAHLIAN AUDIT TERHADAP PENDETEKSIAN KECURANGAN (FRAUD) OLEH AUDITOR

Authors

  • Nabilah Rafifah Khairunnisa Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta
  • Cris Kuntadi Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v3i2.369

Keywords:

Audit Experience, Audit Risk, Audit Expertise, Fraud Detection

Abstract

The large number of fraud cases that have occurred has created new challenges for the external auditor in detecting such fraud. Doing previous research is very important in reviewing an article or scientific journal. The previous research is a reference for an article on solving problems that occur. This article reviews the variables that can affect fraud in the financial statements committed by the auditor. The purpose of this article is to determine the effect of experience, audit risk, and audit expertise on fraud detection by auditors. The method used is literature review or literature review. This type of research is descriptive quantitative. The type of data synthesis used is the narrative method by grouping similar data according to the results measured to answer the objective. The results of the research show that experience, audit risk, and audit expertise simultaneously or jointly have a significant effect on fraud detection by auditors. Partially, each independent variable provides a different conclusion. Partially, audit experience and audit expertise have a significant effect on the detection of fraud (fraud) by the auditor, while audit risk partially has no effect on the detection of fraud (fraud) by the auditor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Christianti, T., Suyono, E., & Farida, Y. N. (2021). Pengaruh Risiko Audit, Tekanan Waktu, Pengalaman Auditor Dan Equity Sensitivity Terhadap Penghentian Prematur Atas Prosedur Audit (Studi Kasus Pada Kap Jakarta Selatan). Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(2), 367-382.

Cris Kuntadi, S. E., & MM, C. (2017). SIKENCUR (Edisi Revisi). Elex Media Komputindo.

Kuntadi, C. (2019). Audit Internal Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Kuntadi, C. (2021). Audit Keuangan Negara. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Kuntadi, C., Puspita, B. A., & Taufik, A. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi pencegahan kecurangan: sistem pengendalian internal, kompetensi sumber daya manusia, kesesuaian kompensasi. Jurnal ekonomi manajemen sistem informasi, 3 (5), 530-539.marundha, a. (2020). Pertimbangan risiko audit dan skeptisme profesional auditor sebagai pendorong kualitas audit dimediasi oleh pendeteksian kecurangan dalam laporan keuangan (studi empiris pada kap di indonesia).

Sari, K. G. A., Wirakusuma, M. G., & Ratnadi, N. M. D. (2018). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional, etika, tipe kepribadian, kompensasi, dan pengalaman pada pendeteksian kecurangan. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 7 (1), 29-56.

Setyaningrum, D., & Kuntadi, C. (2019). The effects of competence, independence, audit work, and communication on the effectiveness of internal audit. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(1), 39-47.

Swastyami, A. P. (2016). Karakteristik Auditor, Risiko Audit, dan Tanggung Jawab Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 15(29), 93-103.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-22

How to Cite

Khairunnisa, N. R., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). PENGARUH PENGALAMAN, RISIKO AUDIT, DAN KEAHLIAN AUDIT TERHADAP PENDETEKSIAN KECURANGAN (FRAUD) OLEH AUDITOR. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 3(2), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v3i2.369