Effectiveness of Leadership, Quality of School Management, and Performance of School Principal in Relation to The Teaching Quality of Teachers

Baharuddin Baharuddin

doi:10.55681/jige.v5i2.2603

Authors

Baharuddin Program Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v5i2.2603

Keywords:

Management Quality, Principal Leadership, Principal Performance, School Effectiveness, Teaching Quality

Abstract

The proficiency of teachers at SMAN 1 Bekasi in facilitating learning exchanges varies significantly. In fact, teachers frequently express dissatisfaction with the students they instruct, deeming them to be inadequately prepared. This study seeks to examine and assess the correlation between the efficacy of the Head of School's leadership, the school's management quality, and the Head of School's performance with the teaching quality of teachers at SMAN 1 Bekasi. This study used a mixed-methods methodology. Questionnaires, interviews, and observations serve as data collecting methods. The findings indicated that the leadership effectiveness of the head of school (X1), the quality of school administration (X2), and the leader's performance (X3) had a significant impact on the teaching quality of teachers (Y), both individually and collectively. The correlation between X1 and Y was 71.5%, the correlation between X2 and Y was 53.6%, and the correlation between X3 and Y was 35.7%. The combined correlation of the three independent variables (X1, X2, and X3) on the dependent variable (Y) was 72.4% and fell into the high category. Based on this study, it can be inferred that the quality of teaching in schools is significantly impacted by three primary characteristics: the leadership of the head of school, the quality of school management, and the performance of the head. Other variables also play a role in determining the overall quality. Every school principal has the ability to promote the enhancement of teaching by implementing efficient leadership, working towards achieving high-quality school administration, and enhancing performance to expedite school advancement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggi. (2022). Pengertian Kualitas Dan Unsur-Unsurnya Dalam Manajemen. ACCURATE.

B, B. (2023). Pengaruh Kemampuan Manajerial Dan Motivasi Kerja Kepala Sekolah Terhadap Kualitas Penerapan Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah Di Kabupaten Sinjai. MANAJERIAL: Jurnal Inovasi Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 3(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.51878/Manajerial.V3i1.2050

Bodgan, R.C. & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods, Fifth Edition 5th Edition. Qualitative Research for Education.

Daryanto. (2008). Administrasi Pendidikan. Rineka Cipta.

Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan Direktorat Jenderal, Pendidikan, P. M. P. D. T. K. D., & Nasional. (2008). Penulisan Modul.

Dukhri. (2018). Hubungan Efektivitas Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dan Kebijakan Karier Dengan Motivasi Berprestasi Guru SMAN Di Kabupaten Pemalang. UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG.

Fachrudi, Soekarto, I. (2003). Pengantar Kepemimpinan Pendidikan. Usana Ofset Printing.

Fathurrochman, I., Adilah, P., Anjriyani, A., & Yudha Prasetya, A. (2022). Pengelolaan Manajemen Sekolah yang Efektif. E-Amal: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.47492/Eamal.V2i2.1581

Hmad Khoirudin, Nur Khoiri, R. B. F. & I. F. N. (2023). Manajemen Sekolah Di Era Society 5.0 Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Dan Produktivitas Sumber Daya Manusia. Ál-Fâhim:Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. Https://Doi.Org/DOI:10.54396/Alfahim.V5i2.746

Kazi, M. (2021). Instructional Leadership: Teaching Evaluation as A Key Element For 6th Grade Student’s Achievement in Mathematics. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6). Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2021-0091

Kim, T., & Lee, Y. (2020). Principal Instructional Leadership for Teacher Participation in Professional Development: Evidence from Japan, Singapore, And South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S12564-019-09616-X

Kristianus J. Tute, L. S. & A. U. (2020). Pengaruh Iklim Kerjadan Kualitas Mengajar Guru Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. BASICEDU. Https://Doi.Org/DOI:Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Basicedu.V4i4.554

Kurniawan, Agung. (2005). Transformasi Pelayanan Publik. Rajawali.

Mulyasa. (2014). Guru Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Musfah, J. (2015). Redesain Pendidikan Guru (Dalam Penerapan Teori Dan Praktik). Prenada Media Group.

Mustasri, M. (2020). Manajemen Pendidikan. Arsad Press.

Mutholib, A., Hanim, Z., & Azainil, A. (2021). Efektivitas Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Peningkatan Kinerja Guru di SMA Negeri 1 Muara Wahau. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Pendidikan (JIMPIAN), 1(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.30872/Jimpian.V1i1.457

Nir, A. E. (2002). School-Based Management and Its Effect on Teacher Commitment. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5(4). Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/13603120210134616

Pratiwi, S. N. (2016). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Sekolah. Edutech, 2(1).

Purwanto, R. (2021). Kepemimpinan Visioner Kepala Sekolah Terhadap Mutu Dan Kualitas Sekolah Di SD Negeri Soko. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 1(4). Https://Doi.Org/10.52436/1.Jpti.26

Putra, M. D. A., Hartini, H., & Azwar, B. (2023). Keterlibatan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Supervisi Pelayanan Bimbingan Dan Konseling. MUHAFADZAH, 3(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.53888/Muhafadzah.V3i2.587

Raharjo, S. B. (2013). Evaluasi Trend Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.21831/Pep.V16i2.1129

Rukmana, A. (2008). KUALITAS KINERJA GURU SEKOLAH DASAR. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 5(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.17509/Jap.V7i1.6249

Sauri, A. S., Widyasari, W., & Sesrita, A. (2018). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Terhadap Kinerja Guru. TADBIR MUWAHHID, 2(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.30997/Jtm.V2i1.1160

Siahaan, Y. E., & Prasetia, I. (2023). Efektivitas Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru Di SMP Negeri 6 Tebing Tinggi. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 9–15.

Silalahi, T. (2022). Efektifitas Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru Di SMPN 7 Tebing Tinggi. Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara University.

Simamora, H. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. STIE YKPN.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Susanto, A. (2016). Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Di SD. Pararaton (Group Elmatera).

Sutrisno, E., Fatoni, A., & Nawawi, H. (2010). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (MSDM). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Syahputri, A. Z., Fallenia, F. Della, & Syafitri, R. (2023). Kerangka Berfikir Penelitian Kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2(1).

Syamsul, H. (2017). Penerapan Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru Pada Jenjang Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Smp). Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.24252/Idaarah.V1i2.4271

Ungin, M. (2013). Studi Tentang Kualitas Tenaga Pengajar (Guru) Pada Smpn 17 Sendawar Kabupaten Kutai Barat. Ejournal Administrasi Negara, 1(1).

Widiana, E. M. (2020). Buku Ajar Pengantar Manajemen. CV. Pena Persada.

Yulisetyawati, A., Burhanuddin, B., & Zulkarnain, W. (2018). Efektivitas Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dan Hubungannya Dengan Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(1), 37–44. Https://Doi.Org/10.17977/Um027v1i12018p37